THE PALEOCRAT TRIBUNE

Little more than a gaggle of hacks and geeks.

The Stench of Modern Feminism

with 3 comments

By Velleitaire
Jan. 9, 2007

On the first day of my Writing and Rhetoric II class, my professor took us for a field trip to the bathroom… yes, the bathroom. We walked down the hallway and when we got to those bathroom doors he asked if we noticed anything different about them. I looked at the doors in front of me and all I could think to say was that they were opposite of each other, one opening to the left and the other to the right.

Apparently I was way off track. He looked at me, pointed to the doors and said,

“This one says men and this one says ladies.”

Well, of course. I had taken notice of this, but I really didn’t consider it to be of any real significance. He went on to ask,

“Well, why don’t they say men and women or ladies and gentleman?”

We then walked back to the classroom in order write about what we thought it meant. Was it significant? Why?

My mind was in a whirlwind. The topics he was getting at (gender sensitivity and feminism) are issues that get me a tad ticked off.

While I failed to voice my opinion in class, I did make sure to write what was on my mind. It seems like almost anything offends women these days, and it has become quite dangerous.

The question that stuck in my mind revolved around the hypocrisy of the whole thing. I mean, why are the very people who say we have to accept people for who they are so intolerant of people who don’t believe the way they do?

Here is a good example: The Vagina Monologues. Olivet College, where Paleo and I attend, is putting on a rendition of the Vagina Monologues this year. I guess they have done it for many years now.  But why is it that colleges like ours, and those all around the country, have no problem with The Vagina Monologues, but students have to be careful when talking about the Bible or religion in class? For that matter, why is it that the Women’s Resource Center has plenty of “safe sex” material and more than a handful of condoms for the taking, but finding pamphlets about abstinence or the dangers of abortion are almost non-existent?

All of this is really peculiar coming from Olivet College. Olivet was  founded as a Christian college. Just looking at the college’s sticker on my laptop I can clearly see the words, “Pro Christo Et Humanitate,” which is Latin meaning “For Christ and humanity.” The seal also has the word Torah in Hebrew! I can only wonder what the founders, and especially Father Shipherd, would say about the current state of affairs. More on that in my next post.

But let’s get back to the bathroom doors. I highly doubt that it was put there by some sort of egotistical womanizer who expressed his chauvinism by referring to women as ladies. The likelihood that the person intended to make women feel inferior to men by referring to them as ladies is rather slim.  Actually, I think it is kind of a compliment.

I am curious to know if anyone considered the possibility that it was done in good will. What if it was meant to make a woman feel respectable and dignified? Who really knows?

It’s one thing to fight for a woman’s right to be treated fair. It is another thing to take exception to being referred to as ladies rather than women on a bathroom door. As for me, I am glad they chose to refer to us as ladies. If only more began acting ladylike.

Advertisements

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. What would they have said it the sign read “woman” instead of “ladies”? Would they have been mad because “man” is part of the word “woman”?

    And why not look at it from the guys perspective? Why aren’t they referred to as “gentlemen”?

    aleebannister

    January 9, 2009 at 5:52 pm

  2. I’ve relieved myself in ‘bathrooms’ with numerous gender-suggestive titles on the door. ‘Gents’ is a favorite. Sometimes only a top hat specifies that there are urinals inside. “Pop” has enticed me to enter as well as Hombre.

    “Ladies” seems more gentile and feminine than Women, but then, what do I know about all of this?

    mud_rake

    January 10, 2009 at 2:07 pm

  3. Of course it’s men who should be “offended” since they’re not referred to politely.

    If you want to mess with this idiot’s head you should file a sexual harassment charge. “I felt naked standing there in front of the toilets! I could feel his filthy eyes undressing me and watching me pee-pee!”

    Sorry the only serious response i could make to this story would be to smash this pervert’s face in for dragging his students to a toilet. How is that appropriate or dignified?

    Also, I’ve noticed that usually tools like that — they think the only way they can get some %#$$@ is by spouting feminist bromides. The only women who’d be impressed by such a nimrod would be the kind of women I wouldn’t touch with a ten foot pole if I was paid to.

    Akira

    March 10, 2009 at 3:33 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: